All-World Classic

Reloading the 6.5×54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer

By John Barsness

If the 6.5×54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer cartridge appeared today, it might be one of the 60-zillion smaller 6.5mm rounds now considered ideal for the high ballistic coefficient of 0.264-inch bullets. Its two big disadvantages would be the shoulder angle of 24 degrees, not the 30 degrees now considered ideal for accuracy, and the case-head diameter, a fingernail’s thickness smaller than the 12mm (0.473 inch) that eventually became the world standard due to the 7.9x57J Mauser. But the modest powder capacity and fast rifling twist would fit right in.

However, the little cartridge has all the modern 6.5’s beat in another way: During the first of the 20th century it was the most popular 6.5mm hunting cartridge on Planet Earth.

Sport & War

According to Cartridges of the World at least a dozen other modest 6.5mm cartridges appeared before World War I, all producing similar ballistics. The 6.5×54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer became popular not because it was absolutely the best case or a military round (though it was, having been first adopted by Greece in 1903). Instead it was due to the nifty little sporting carbine offered by Steyr.

With iron sights (used by almost all hunters back then), the carbine weighed around 6 pounds despite its full-length stock—soon called a Mannlicher stock by English-speaking shooters. Like the tube magazine of the 6-pound 1894 Winchester carbine, the stock moved enough weight forward for the Model 1903 to balance nicely, even for offhand shooting. The original ballistics for both the 6.5×54 and .30 WCF were also remarkably similar: a 156-grain or 160-grain bullet at around 2,000 fps in carbine barrels, fast enough to provide a flat trajectory to the practical hunting limits of iron sights, but slow enough for primitive jacketed bullets to penetrate reliably. (One source says the muzzle velocity of the original military load of the 6.5×54 was slightly over 2,200 fps, but that’s from the Greek military rifle’s 28.55-inch barrel.)

The higher sectional density of 6.5mm bullets, however, often resulted in deeper penetration than the .30-30, and the Mannlicher-Schoenauer carbine acquired a reputation for killing big game above its weight class. The action itself was designed by Ferdinand Mannlicher, with a rotary magazine by Otto Schoenauer. Both worked very slickly and reliably, and the carbine gained a worldwide following among many hunter-authors who provided an enormous amount of publicity.

During the first half of the 20th century the 6.5×54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer
was the most publicized 6.5mm hunting cartridge, thanks to many hunter-authors.

The action was designed by Ferdinand Mannlicher and the rotary magazine
by Otto Schoenauer. Turning the floorplate 90 degrees allowed the magazine
to be removed from the action.

Literary Connection

Ernest Hemingway is no doubt the most famous today, frequently mentioning “the Mannlicher” in his 1935 book about his first safari, Green Hills of Africa. But he also made it notorious in his short story, The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber, where the wife of a safari client kills her husband (perhaps accidentally, perhaps not) with a Mannlicher-Schoenauer carbine during a charge from a wounded Cape buffalo.

Hemingway, however, was a follower of the Mannlicher, not a leader. Many other authors had already prominently mentioned the cartridge and carbine, including American explorers Roy Chapman Andrews and Charles Sheldon, Canadian explorer Vilhajalmur Stefansson, and African hunter W.D.M. Bell. While more 6.5×55’s may have been used by hunters, the Norwegian-Swedish cartridge wasn’t widely known outside Scandinavia, while the 6.5×54 became a worldwide standard.

Before World War II the Stoeger company imported Steyr sporters, but after the war all German and Austrian arms factories were closed for several years. Stoeger filled the gap by having a number of carbines made on a military Mannlicher-Schoenauer action, commissioned in 1930 by the Greek government. A few years ago I acquired what may or may not be one of these semi-custom carbines, through a trade with a rifle loony named Scott Magie. There’s no Stoeger name on the carbine, but it’s very well done, though with a 19-inch barrel rather than the 70cm (17.7 inch) barrel on the original 1903 carbines. Scott had a local gunsmith fit a Williams aperture sight to the cocking piece, and despite the extra barrel length the carbine still weighs only slightly over 6-1/2 pounds.

It also has an essentially pristine barrel measuring the modern standard 0.256-inch across the lands and 0.264 in the grooves. Many 1903 carbines had deeper grooves, perhaps due to the cupronickel jackets commonly used on early smokeless bullets. Fouling from such jackets built up quickly to the point where some barrels bulged or even burst, exactly why the original 0.318-inch grooves of the 7.9×57 Mauser were deepened to 0.323, creating the “S” variation used in most 8mm barrels today.

Theoretically such deep-grooved 1903’s may require slightly larger-diameter bullets to shoot accurately, but my experience has been bore diameter is far more important than groove depth, the reason some tighter-bored .303 British rifles are accurate with .308 bullets. I suspect the real reason some Model 1903 6.5×54’s shoot better with slightly larger diameter bullets, such as Hornady’s 0.267-inch 160-grain roundnose, is bores were enlarged by corrosive primers, which weren’t phased out until non-corrosive priming became common in the 1920’s.

The 0.267 bullet, by the way, isn’t listed at this instant (8:48 a.m. on December 26, 2016) on the list of InterLock bullets on Hornady’s website, despite being specifically mentioned in their 9th manual, though if you use the “Bullet Search” function it shows up. But these days bullets come and go on Hornady’s website, depending on whether they’re in production at the time. A couple of years ago many 6.5×54 handloaders panicked when the 0.264 diameter 160-grain roundnose disappeared from the site, but it’s there now.

Scott Magie had worked up a load with the 0.264 160-grain Hornady and H4831 that got almost 2,200 fps and to save time I used the same load for hunting that fall, but found the bullet’s performance on game erratic at this velocity. Once it broke both shoulders of a whitetail doe and exited, but on another deer did not reach the far side of the chest on a broadside rib shot. Dropping the powder charge to 37.0 grains reduced muzzle velocity to a little over 2,000 fps, where the bullet has performed more reliably.

At higher velocities the 156-grain Norma Oryx, a bonded bullet, penetrates and expands very well at iron-sight ranges. The only minor problem is the squarish edge on the flattened tip which needs to be filed slightly round to feed reliably. The 140-grain Nosler Partition also shoots reasonably well and the Partition’s soft front cores expand well at moderate velocities.

However, another Hornady bullet performs well at higher velocities—the 129-grain Spire Point and it shoots more accurately at around 2,500 fps. In fact it’s the most accurate bullet I’ve found in the carbine, somewhat surprising considering the long chamber throat and it feeds fine from the magazine.

New 6.5×54 brass is no problem. I got some Norma cases in the trade for the rifle and purchased more later. Prvi Partisan brass is also available in the US. If any handloader has a yearning to use the most popular 6.5mm cartridge of a century ago, the only real problem is buying a Mannlicher-Schoenauer carbine. They’re not unknown in North America, but tend to cost a little more than the average factory rifle!

Half of John Barsness’s dozen books are on firearms and shooting. His latest is The Hunter’s Guide to Handloading Smokeless Rifle Cartridges, published in the fall of 2015 by Deep Creek Press. It’s available through, P.O. Box 579, Townsend, MT 59644, (406) 521-0273.

Read More Handloading Articles

Purchase A Password To Read The May 2017 Digital Edition
(Includes FREE Download Of PDF Version For Your Desktop Or Mobile Device)

Purchase A Printed Copy Of The May 2017 Issue

Purchase A PDF Download Of The May 2017 Issue Now!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Spamcheck Enabled)