Posted in Rights Watch | 6 Comments

EXCLUSIVE: Preemptive Strike

Back before a handful of other states adopted “Constitutional Carry” laws providing for permitless carrying of concealed firearms, the practice was called “Vermont Carry,” as the Green Mountain State stood alone throughout the 20th Century in not prohibiting it. Long known for lenient gun laws and low numbers of homicides, Vermont represented the perfect real-world test of economist John Lott’s “More Guns Less Crime” thesis.

Which made it a threat to the gun-grabbers…

Vermont had also enacted firearms preemption legislation, meaning laws were set by the state, prohibiting municipalities from establishing a “patchwork quilt” of conflicting ordinances that would make it practically impossible to “lawfully” possess a gun and comply with edicts across all jurisdictions. And so far, despite Vermont being a notoriously “progressive” state politically (“Independent” Senator Bernie Sanders openly identifies as a socialist), the 2-edged sword preemption can present has been blocked in the legislature: Several attempts at enacting “gun control” edicts in 2013 did not make it out of committee, and Governor Peter Shumlin even signed the Sportsmen’s Act, ensuring those bow hunting or dog training could also carry a handgun for self-protection provided they did not use it to harvest game.

Thwarted at the state level, anti-gun forces turned their focus on eviscerating state preemption, and the City of Burlington provided the perfect political environment. Overwhelmingly dominated by the left (the Council is comprised of two Independents, four Progressives, seven Democrats and one Republican, and the mayor is a Democrat), the Council’s Charter Change Committee, per the Vermont Journalism Trust’s VT Digger news website, proposed ordinances to “ban assault weapons, restrict those with domestic violence convictions from obtaining a firearm, require a permitting process for concealed weapons, ban firearms from establishments that serve alcohol, and require that firearms be kept ‘under lock and key,’ separate from another locked location where ammunition is kept.”

Disturbingly, the chair of the committee told followers she was holding the resolutions “at the urging of the GunSense Vermont organizers [to] give them more time for the statewide strategies they are working on.” Committee minutes also referenced correspondence that “includes language from Gun Free VT” and asks “if it includes [New York City Michael] Bloomberg’s model that [Burlington Mayor Miro] Weinberger presented.”

Quick to respond to this threat, the Vermont Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs filed a demand for documents related to official proceedings and correspondence so they could mount a defense against the measures that they warned would “slice and dice” the Vermont Sportsmen’s Bill of Rights. The city responded by denying and then stonewalling VFSC’s request and exempting over a hundred documents from public scrutiny (at this writing). While the resolutions passed by the Council have since been narrowed to three (guns in bars, mandatory storage and gun seizure following domestic violence reports), the changes still must face approval in March by Burlington voters, with the Vermont Legislature then authorizing cities to adopt their own gun laws. Backers have made it clear they’ll take what they can get and try for more later, with their stated goal being for other cities to adopt their own measures, ending preemption in Vermont.

And everywhere else…
By David Codrea

Read More Rights Watch Articles

Share |
  1. Guns are not the problem, and never were!

  2. Diamondback says:

    If city ordinances violate state law they’re unenforceable.

    Add that they also violate the protections of the 2nd Amendment which was applied/incorporated against the states in McDonald v. Chicago, June 2010, and it makes them doubly unenforceable.

    Use the US codes to shoot them all down:

    18 USC Sections 241, 242
    42 USC Sections 1983, 1985, 1986

    Use the power of JURY NULLIFICATION to release fellow citizens from any charges UNCONSTITUTIONALLY brought against them.

    Collusion to violate fundamental civil rights UNDER COLOR OF LAW.

    Sic’em!

  3. time for these type of committee members ,all over this country ,to be ‘brought to the wood shed’

  4. Its OK! I heard Vermont -due to its BANKRUPT, RUN-DOWN STATE- will be seceeding from the U.S. soon anyway! After all – how many Americans can even tell you where it IS – its so insignificant!!

    Would YOU move YOUR business there?

    Thought not.

    • Timmy, you wish you could be a Vermonter. Best people in THE world. Business is everywhere with the internet. Your living in the dark ages. Get a life and then a gun.
      Joel

  5. Hey Timmy, et al;
    “If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
    - Samuel Adams

Leave a Reply

(Spamcheck Enabled)